Flora Sophie Lemburg
From all Old English manuscripts, the Vercelli Book is surely one of the most mysterious. During the Spring School 2024 I had the chance to visit the Vercelli Book in person, in the Capitulary Library of Vercelli, fulfilling one of my dreams as a scholar of medieval English. During this entry, I would like to take you on a little journey discovering the many peculiarities of the Vercelli Book.
What is Old English?
Before we get started, we need to talk a bit about medieval English in order to understand what is exactly written in the Vercelli Book and why it is so special. When someone speaks about medieval English, they basically mean the language that was spoken in what is now (roughly speaking) England before the fifteenth century – think ‘before Shakespeare’. Scholars of English literature will divide periods of the English language and its literature a bit further:
- Old English (sometimes also called Anglo-Saxon): 600-1100 CE
- Middle English: 1100-1500 CE
- Early Modern English: 1500-1700 CE
- Modern English: 1700-1900 CE
- Present Day English: 1900 –
For us, Old English is the most interesting one, as this is the language that is primarily written in the Vercelli Book. Old English is a Germanic language, closely related to other Germanic languages such as German or Dutch. There are also traces of Scandinavian languages detectable, especially in late Old English, which can be attributed to the contact between the natives of England and the vikings (seafaring people coming from modern Scandinavia and Russia). After the Norman Conquest (1066 CE), French became the predominant influence on the English language, and it developed into what we now refer to as ‘Middle-English’.
Old English and its Codices
Now, there is a lot written in Old English. Charters, liturgical texts, and, of course, stories. These narratives were mainly written in verse form. If people talk about Old English literature, they generally mean verse. All that we have left in this category – we assume that there was a lot more literature that is now lost to us – is kept in four Old English codices. A codex is a book made from manuscripts, basically the precursor to our modern book. Regarding Old English, there is the Nowell Codex(shelf mark: Cotton MS Vitellius A XV), which is kept in the British Library in London. It contains probably the most famous Old English narrative, Beowulf, as well as a biblical retelling called Judith, and some other texts. Then there is the Junius Manuscript(MS Junius 11), kept in the Bodleian Library in Oxford, which contains some more biblical retellings, such as Genesis, Exodus, and Daniel. The third codex is the Exeter Book (Exeter Cathedral Library MS 3501) which can be found in Exeter. This holds shorter and longer works of verse, such as the poem Juliana by the poet Cynewulf, and several elegies and riddles. Last but not least, the fourth codex is our Vercelli Book, containing Christian poems and homilies written in a mix of prose and verse. This codex is not kept in the UK but has its home in the Capitulary Library of Vercelli, Italy, and has been there since at least the twelfth century. This location of an Old English manuscript in Northern Italy makes the Vercelli book so intriguing. How did it get there? Why has it been there, continuously, for such a long time?
We might find some hints in the manuscript itself…
Palaeography
The Vercelli Book consists of 135 folios (pages) made from parchment. This might seem fairly straightforward, but as it often happens in medieval studies, it is more complicated than that. The first 104 folios are primarily made from calfskin, in palaeography we call this kind of parchment vellum. On folio 105r (r refers to Latin recto, so the front of folio 105), the layout of the text changes.

Now the text takes up more space on the page. Why? One could assume that the scribe ran out of parchment. When he received additional leaves, he made more use of the space he had, maybe conscious of the likelihood that he could run out of parchment again. This theory is supported by the fact that from folio 105 onward we do not have vellum, but parchment made from sheep or goat’s skin.
The Vercelli Book was written in one hand, meaning that only a single scribe copied the entirety of the text, compiling the content from at least five different sources. The script itself is called Anglo-Saxon square minuscule. There are three different types of Anglo-Saxon minuscule, round, square, and pointed, corresponding to three phases in the development of this script. Anglo-Saxon square minuscule had its beginnings from c. 920 CE and lasted throughout the tenth century before changing into its round phase at the turn of the century. Most of the manuscripts described above are written in square minuscule.

Finding out more information about this manuscript and its palaeographical features proves to be difficult at times because of the scholars who came before us. They have tried to ‘recover’ parts of the manuscript, often with destructive consequences. When the Vercelli Book was first rediscovered in Italy by Friedrich Bluhme in 1822, it was quickly sought after by other scholars and first transcribed by C. Maier. During his transcription in 1833-34, Maier tried to make parts of the texts more visible by applying certain chemical reagents.

This was a common practice in the nineteenth century among scholars, the idea being to recover text that had faded over time. Maier used gallnut tincture, basically a mixture of gallic and tannic acids, to recover the iron gall ink that was used by the scribe of the Vercelli Book. The idea was that these acids would react with the ferrous traces of the erased script to ‘return’ some of the original colour and visibility. Sadly, the use of these reagents has done more damage than recovery and most of the folios treated with gallnut tincture have been grossly damaged. Nevertheless, with new techniques such as MSI (multi-spectral imaging) one can still recover parts of the texts through images made with various different wave-lengths, making text visible that cannot be identified with the naked eye.

Why Italy?
While there are many theories about the provenance of the Vercelli Book and its final location – none of which is definitely proven – I wish to introduce one that appears most likely to me. Professor Winfried Rudolf has argued that an important hint to the location-question of the Vercelli Book is the German bishop Leo, who was Bishop of Vercelli from 999 CE. He was one of the most learned scholars in Europe of his time and a great bibliophile. Therefore, Leo could be someone who was involved with the Vercelli Book if its arrival coincided with his time in Vercelli. Furthermore, he was able to speak and write Old Saxon, a medieval Germanic language closely related to Old English. We know that these languages are very close to each other because of the Old English copy of the poem Genesis, of which parts exist also in Old Saxon. Placed next to each other, one can see that the texts are remarkably similar linguistically, with only minor orthographic differences. Thus, we can assume that Leo was also able to understand and read Old English, which makes him an excellent audience for the Christian content that we can find in the Vercelli Book. One final piece of evidence is the decoration of the manuscript, which is sparse but shows an interesting connection to Leo. On one page we can find a small image underneath a text depicting a lion, on another page a decorated initial probably also showing a lion’s head. In the Metrum Leonis, a text written by Leo – not to be found in the Vercelli Book – Leo portrays himself as a lion. Coincidence?


Texts of the Vercelli Book: The Dream of the Rood and Elene
Luckily, some of the more famous texts of the Vercelli Book have remained mostly unharmed by the aforementioned reagents. Students of Old English will be aware of the Christian poem Dream of the Rood, fewer might know the poem Elene. While these names are now the standard titles for these texts, they are actually not recorded in the manuscript.
Both texts just start with their first line, the only indication that this is a different text than the previous one is the large, decorated initial. The titles were added by later scholars who first analysed these texts in the early nineteenth century. The Dream of the Rood is essentially a dream vision. We hear first how someone dreams, after all ‘reord berend’ (speech bearers) went to sleep. This person dreams of a tree, which is a ‘syllicre treow’ (a most splendid tree). This tree is not only very big, but also decorated with gold and gems. At some point this tree starts talking – students will then wonder whether they have mistranslated something – and the tree introduces itself as the tree from which the cross was made on which Jesus Christ was crucified. The tree/cross – rood is an archaic term for cross – then retells the crucifixion from its perspective, depicting Christ as a warrior who sacrifices himself in order to triumph over death. The poem is a fascinating combination of concepts from Christianity and ideas from pre-Christian belief-systems of Germanic-speaking regions.
The poem Elene is also rooted in Christianity but centres around a female saint, Saint Helena. This is Empress Helena, mother of Constantine the Great who introduced Christianity to the Roman Empire in the early fourth century. According to the legend recounted in Elene, which is an adaptation of the Judas Cyriacus legend, Helena/Elene travels to Jerusalem to find the true cross (the cross on which Jesus was crucified). Of course she is successful in her endeavours, making her the patron saint of archaeologists. If anyone is ever looking for a fierce female character in Old English, I suggest taking a look at Elene and her colleagues Judith and Juliana (both characters in their own Old English poems, Judith and Juliana).
Of course there are many more texts in the Vercelli Book, such as Andreas and Soul and Body. If you are now excited to learn more about the Vercelli Book and its contents, I suggest to start here where you can find the manuscript fully digitised. Maybe you can solve the mystery of the Vercelli Book!
Bibliography:
Bock, Oliver. ‘C. Maier’s Use of a Reagent in the Vercelli Book’. The Library 16, no. 3 (2015): 249–81.
Rabin, Ira, Hahn, Oliver, Easton, Roger, Knox, Keyth T., Boydston, Ken, Heyworth, G., … Phelps, Michael. (2015). Initial inspection of reagent damage to the Vercelli Book. Comparative Oriental Manuscript Studies Bulletin, 1(1), 34–45. http://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.377
Roberts, Jane. Guide to Scripts Used in English Writings up to 1500. Liverpool University Press, 2015. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1gn6bd5. Accessed 20 Mar. 2024.
Rudolf, Winfried. “On the Italian Provenance of the Vercelli Book.” In Manuscripts in the Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms: Cultures and Connections, edited by Claire Breay and Joanna Story, 154–167. Dublin: Four Courts, 2021.
Wittmann Zollinger, Cynthia. ‘Cynewulf´s “Elene” and the Patterns of the Past’. University of Illinois Press, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 103, no. No 2 (April 2004): 180–96.


































